linux-l: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

[Mail Delivery System]

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:

  seba at mail.cw-net.de:
    delivery cancelled by administrator

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de>
Received: from (gandalf.YacUn.NET) [195.20.200.104] (root)
	by mail.neckar-alb.de with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 11gC1o-0000cz-00 (Debian); Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:13:06 +0200
Received: from localhost (IDENT:root at localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gandalf.YacUn.NET (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA01248
	for <seba at localhost>; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:11:29 +0200
Received: from mail.cw-net.de
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.0.0)
	for seba at localhost (single-drop); Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:11:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from (mail.vr.IN-Berlin.DE) [192.109.42.4] 
	by mail.neckar-alb.de with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 11euAq-0006lE-00 (Debian); Sat, 23 Oct 1999 07:57:04 +0200
Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost)
	by mail.vr.IN-Berlin.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA02938;
	Sat, 23 Oct 1999 07:47:37 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de)
Received: by GNU.IN-Berlin.DE (bulk_mailer v1.11); Sat, 23 Oct 1999 07:47:30 +0200
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by mail.vr.IN-Berlin.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA02897
	for mlists-in-berlin-de-outgoing-linux-l; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 07:46:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 07:46:55 +0200
From: Philipp Grau <phgrau at ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE>
To: linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de
Subject: linux-l: Re: Reply-To: linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de *saugt* (was: linux-l: Zeit für Verhaltensregeln?)
Message-ID: <19991023074655.A103614 at CIS.FU-Berlin.DE>
References: <380C5226.D577D3B9 at actis.de> <199910200653.IAA04563 at joker.rz.hu-berlin.de> <19991020093918.A98128 at CIS.FU-Berlin.DE> <m11eKas-000JkqC at fwd14.btx.dtag.de> <19991021212249.B1124 at aleks.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <19991022013805.A24573 at jazz.biologie.fu-berlin.de> <19991022100946.B20870 at bert.in-berlin.de> <deathsquad.m37lkf5urd.fsf at socha.net> <deathsquad.m3emen2e74.fsf at socha.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i
In-Reply-To: <deathsquad.m3emen2e74.fsf at socha.net>; from robin at socha.net on Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 01:00:47AM +0200
Sender: owner-linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de
Reply-To: linux-l at mlists.in-berlin.de
X-UIDL: d08f977c0a0ca166dc404421aa2f7fa2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by gandalf.YacUn.NET id VAA01248

Hallo Robin!

On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 01:00:47AM +0200, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> Denkste! K=F6nnte mir bitte jemand in leicht verst=E4ndlichen Worten
> erkl=E4ren, warum der listserver ein bereits gesetztes reply-to
> =FCberschreibt?[1]

Ich weiss nicht warum er das macht, er ist halt so eingestellt.
Und auch wenn es manchmal etwas l=E4stig ist, scheinen sich die meisten
daran gewoehnt zu haben. Und da auf deine Anmerkungen hier, so recht
keiner reagiert, scheint es auch keinen so richtig als Thema
hinter dem Ofen hervorzulocken. Hast Du mal den list-owner
gefragt? Ich glaube der liest nur am rande mit...

\bye
Philipp


--=20
    We had joy, we had fun, | we had Pacman on the sun...     =20