linux-l: Dringende Samba Frage ...

[Alexander Lehmann]

* Guido Roock (G.Roock at gmx.de) [010301 07:06]:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:17:03PM +0100, Alexander Lehmann wrote:
> > * Guido Roock (G.Roock at gmx.de) [010228 21:01]:
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 05:43:04PM +0100, Alexander Lehmann wrote:
> > > > * Guido Roock (G.Roock at gmx.de) [010228 17:27]:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:11:41PM +0100, Duncan Rubinger wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > schon mal geben PDC unter samba :)
> > > > 
> > > Okay, wenn soviel Interesse besteht :-))))
> > > 
> > > ich benutze die letzte stabile Version (2.0.7)
> > 
> > und die kan leider kein PDC ... zumindest nicht fuer NT rechner. 
> 
> vorsichtig ...
> 
> /usr/share/doc/samba-doc/NTDOMAIN.txt
> 
> As of 1.9.18alpha1, Samba supports logins for NT 3.51 and 4.0
> Workstations, without the need, use or intervention of NT Server.
> ...

Please note that Samba 2.0 does not **officially** support domain logons
for Windows NT clients.  Of course, domain logon support for Windows 9x
clients is complete and official.  These are two different issues.

Samba's capability to act as a Primary Domain Controller for Windows NT
domains is not advertised as it is not completed yet.  For more information 
regarding how to obtain the latest development (HEAD branch) source code
and what features are available, please refer to the NT Domain FAQ on-line
at the Samba web site under the documentation page.

aber:

> http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/ntdomfaq.html

Samba 207 will do some Domain Controller things. It certainly does not do 
all of them and it does not do as much as the TNG version of Samba. 

na wie nu? gut, ich gebe zu ich habe mich dabei nur auf die localen howtos
bezogen. aber ich hoffe mal, das version 2.2 das dann endlich kann :)
laut faq:
http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html

in freudiger erwartung auf offical samba 2.2

> Wir koennten jetzt darueber fachsimpeln, denn was bitte macht einen PDC
> aus. Bei Samba fehlt ledeglich eine Funktion (BDC). Alles andere geht
> (Domaintrust, User, Groups, Machine Accounts, etc.)

koennen wir, lassen. mir scheint, du hast dich ausfuehrlich damit
beschaeftigt :)

bis denne

Alex