Ocaml vs. Java (Re: [linux-l] Ocml vs. Java)

Oliver Bandel oliver at first.in-berlin.de
Do Sep 22 00:53:14 CEST 2005


On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:51:28PM +0200, Olaf Radicke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 16:14 schrieb Oliver Bandel:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > wegen Software, die in OCaml erstellt wurde, kannste ja hier mal schauen:
> 
> iteressant ist auch ein kurzer Blick auf  sourceforge. Da erfahren wir, des es 
> gerade mal 42 Projekte mit Ocml gibt. Zum vergleich:

OCaml, nicht Ocml.
Das Subject war falsch.

Vielleicht hats Du deswegen so wenige gefünden. ;-)
Typo? ;-)

Jon Harrop hatte mal geschaut, wie das mit OCaml und SourceForge aussieht:


Er schrieb in einer Mail auf Caml-list (20.02.2005):
==============================================================================
> I was just reading this presentation and stumbled upon some figures it
> contains of the number of freshmeat projects written in different languages:
> 
> http://www.uclan.ac.uk/facs/destech/gradschool/autumnschool/thu11built-karlin2.pdf
> 
> According to this, just over a year ago (09/2003), OCaml was the 31st most
> popular language with 22 projects.
> 
> Checking freshmeat now, OCaml is the 24th most popular language with 52
> projects. Here's the full {language, projects} list:
> 
> {{C, 7066}, {Java, 3769}, {C++, 3523}, {Perl, 3300}, {PHP, 2947}, {Python,
>     1763}, {Unix Shell, 721}, {Tcl, 421}, {JavaScript, 409}, {SQL,
>     405}, {Objective C, 260}, {Other, 221}, {Assembly, 220}, {Ruby, 219}, {C#,
>      155}, {Other Scripting Engines, 125}, {Scheme, 111}, {Lisp, 81}, {PL/SQL,
>      78}, {Delphi, 74}, {Fortran, 62}, {Ada, 56}, {Common Lisp, 54}, {OCaml,
>     52}, {Emacs-Lisp, 51}, {Pascal, 48}, {Haskell, 48}, {Awk, 46}, {Zope,
>     41}, {Smalltalk, 33}, {ASP, 33}, {Visual Basic, 31}, {Basic, 30}, {Eiffel,
>      28}, {ML, 27}, {YACC, 24}, {Forth, 23}, {Cold Fusion,
>     20}, {Object Pascal, 19}, {Prolog, 18}, {Erlang, 18}, {Pike, 11}, {Lua,
>     11}, {Rexx, 10}, {Modula, 9}, {Groovy, 5}, {Logo, 4}, {Euphoria, 4}, {APL,
>      3}, {PROGRESS, 2}, {Pliant, 2}, {Dylan, 2}, {XBasic, 1}, {Simula,
>     1}, {REALbasic, 1}, {Euler, 1}}
> 
> I also computed the fractional increase in the number of projects for each
> language to determine how rapidly languages have been adopted over the past
> year. C# is 1st and OCaml is 2nd:
> 
> {{C#, 3.44444}, {OCaml, 2.36364}, {Objective C, 1.91176}, {Common Lisp,
>     1.86207}, {JavaScript, 1.74043}, {Haskell, 1.71429}, {Ruby,
>     1.71094}, {Java, 1.57304}, {Emacs-Lisp, 1.54545}, {Delphi, 1.48}, {Ada,
>     1.47368}, {Python, 1.47162}, {PHP, 1.43058}, {C++, 1.41999}, {Scheme,
>     1.40506}, {SQL, 1.38225}, {Fortran, 1.37778}, {Unix Shell,
>     1.30144}, {Other Scripting Engines, {}}, {PL/SQL, 1.27869}, {C,
>     1.28077}, {ASP, 1.26923}, {Pascal, 1.26316}, {Assembly, 1.24294}, {Lisp,
>     1.22727}, {Zope, 1.20588}, {Perl, 1.19392}, {Tcl, 1.17927}, {Awk,
>     1.15}, {Other, 0.840304}}
> 
> Considering that C# is pushed by Microsoft, Objective C is pushed by Apple and
> LISP is pushed by Thomas Fischbacher ;-), I think this is very impressive.
> 
> I've also checked the number of unique posters to caml-list per month, which
> has continued to rise exponentially since 1992, currently weighs in at 300
> and is set to hit 1,000 in the year 2008.
==============================================================================

Noch Fragen? ;-)



Ciao,
   Oliver

P.S.: Müsste Deine Links mal anschauen, aber jetzt, wo ich da hier die Mail
      schreibe bin ich gerade offline.



Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste linux-l