Ocaml vs. Java (Re: [linux-l] Ocml vs. Java)
Oliver Bandel
oliver at first.in-berlin.de
Do Sep 22 00:53:14 CEST 2005
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:51:28PM +0200, Olaf Radicke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 16:14 schrieb Oliver Bandel:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > wegen Software, die in OCaml erstellt wurde, kannste ja hier mal schauen:
>
> iteressant ist auch ein kurzer Blick auf sourceforge. Da erfahren wir, des es
> gerade mal 42 Projekte mit Ocml gibt. Zum vergleich:
OCaml, nicht Ocml.
Das Subject war falsch.
Vielleicht hats Du deswegen so wenige gefünden. ;-)
Typo? ;-)
Jon Harrop hatte mal geschaut, wie das mit OCaml und SourceForge aussieht:
Er schrieb in einer Mail auf Caml-list (20.02.2005):
==============================================================================
> I was just reading this presentation and stumbled upon some figures it
> contains of the number of freshmeat projects written in different languages:
>
> http://www.uclan.ac.uk/facs/destech/gradschool/autumnschool/thu11built-karlin2.pdf
>
> According to this, just over a year ago (09/2003), OCaml was the 31st most
> popular language with 22 projects.
>
> Checking freshmeat now, OCaml is the 24th most popular language with 52
> projects. Here's the full {language, projects} list:
>
> {{C, 7066}, {Java, 3769}, {C++, 3523}, {Perl, 3300}, {PHP, 2947}, {Python,
> 1763}, {Unix Shell, 721}, {Tcl, 421}, {JavaScript, 409}, {SQL,
> 405}, {Objective C, 260}, {Other, 221}, {Assembly, 220}, {Ruby, 219}, {C#,
> 155}, {Other Scripting Engines, 125}, {Scheme, 111}, {Lisp, 81}, {PL/SQL,
> 78}, {Delphi, 74}, {Fortran, 62}, {Ada, 56}, {Common Lisp, 54}, {OCaml,
> 52}, {Emacs-Lisp, 51}, {Pascal, 48}, {Haskell, 48}, {Awk, 46}, {Zope,
> 41}, {Smalltalk, 33}, {ASP, 33}, {Visual Basic, 31}, {Basic, 30}, {Eiffel,
> 28}, {ML, 27}, {YACC, 24}, {Forth, 23}, {Cold Fusion,
> 20}, {Object Pascal, 19}, {Prolog, 18}, {Erlang, 18}, {Pike, 11}, {Lua,
> 11}, {Rexx, 10}, {Modula, 9}, {Groovy, 5}, {Logo, 4}, {Euphoria, 4}, {APL,
> 3}, {PROGRESS, 2}, {Pliant, 2}, {Dylan, 2}, {XBasic, 1}, {Simula,
> 1}, {REALbasic, 1}, {Euler, 1}}
>
> I also computed the fractional increase in the number of projects for each
> language to determine how rapidly languages have been adopted over the past
> year. C# is 1st and OCaml is 2nd:
>
> {{C#, 3.44444}, {OCaml, 2.36364}, {Objective C, 1.91176}, {Common Lisp,
> 1.86207}, {JavaScript, 1.74043}, {Haskell, 1.71429}, {Ruby,
> 1.71094}, {Java, 1.57304}, {Emacs-Lisp, 1.54545}, {Delphi, 1.48}, {Ada,
> 1.47368}, {Python, 1.47162}, {PHP, 1.43058}, {C++, 1.41999}, {Scheme,
> 1.40506}, {SQL, 1.38225}, {Fortran, 1.37778}, {Unix Shell,
> 1.30144}, {Other Scripting Engines, {}}, {PL/SQL, 1.27869}, {C,
> 1.28077}, {ASP, 1.26923}, {Pascal, 1.26316}, {Assembly, 1.24294}, {Lisp,
> 1.22727}, {Zope, 1.20588}, {Perl, 1.19392}, {Tcl, 1.17927}, {Awk,
> 1.15}, {Other, 0.840304}}
>
> Considering that C# is pushed by Microsoft, Objective C is pushed by Apple and
> LISP is pushed by Thomas Fischbacher ;-), I think this is very impressive.
>
> I've also checked the number of unique posters to caml-list per month, which
> has continued to rise exponentially since 1992, currently weighs in at 300
> and is set to hit 1,000 in the year 2008.
==============================================================================
Noch Fragen? ;-)
Ciao,
Oliver
P.S.: Müsste Deine Links mal anschauen, aber jetzt, wo ich da hier die Mail
schreibe bin ich gerade offline.
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste linux-l