Kein Betreff

>From guckes  Thu Dec 10 22:53:42 1998
Return-Path: <owner-linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de>
Delivered-To: guckes at math.fu-berlin.de
Received: (qmail 15037 invoked from network); 10 Dec 1998 21:53:39 -0000
Received: from methan.in-berlin.de (160.45.10.13)
  by 160.45.40.10 with SMTP; 10 Dec 1998 21:53:39 -0000
Received: from calle.in-berlin.de (root at calle.in-berlin.de [193.175.21.97])
	by methan.in-berlin.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA28823;
	Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:53:27 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from owner-linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de)
Received: by calle.in-berlin.de (Smail3.2.0.98) 
	  from  localhost with smtp
	  id <m0zoDpr-000A0YC>; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:41:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by calle.in-berlin.de (Smail3.2.0.98)
	  id <m0zoDpo-000A0Oa>; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:41:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <19981210223738.E27271 at keep.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:37:38 +0100
From: Wolfgang Jung <woju at keep.in-berlin.de>
To: linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de
Subject: Re: linux-l: Aus dem news-log...
Mail-Followup-To: linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de
References: <13935.47368.581219.703970 at mero.in-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i
In-Reply-To: <13935.47368.581219.703970 at mero.in-berlin.de>; from Carsten Wartmann on Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:06:29PM +0100
Sender: owner-linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de
Reply-To: linux-l at calle.in-berlin.de
Status: RO
Content-Length: 953
Lines: 33

On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:06:29PM +0100, Carsten Wartmann wrote: 
> ...hab ich heute folgendes bekommen:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> [···]
> Curious NNRP server explorers
> System                          Conn
> elvis.usintelicom.com              1
> 
> NNRP no permission clients
> System                          Conn
> elvis.usintelicom.com              1
> [···]
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> Ist das Grund zur Sorge?

Solange die Knaben auf Deiner Kiste keine News zu lesen bekommen,
was das no permission ja abgeleht hat, denke ich dass das wenig 
Sorge verursachen muss.

Was viel interessanter ist, ist die tatsache, dass das einer 
waehrend Deiner "kurzen" (gegenueber 24 h/Tag, wie drawbridge)
Onlinezeit gemacht hat. 

Dies sagt zumindest aus, dass trotz Offlinebetriebs , seinen
Newsserver dicht halten muss.
Es scheint reichlich NNTP Scanner zu geben..

Gruss
	Wolfgang

--